Legal Opinion
BORDEN v. NGM INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 8, 2023No. 2:20-cv-01878Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW BORDEN Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-1878 NGM INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. March 8, 2023 This is an insurance dispute between Plaintiff Matthew Borden and his insurer Defendant NGM Insurance Company, arising out of NGM’s handling of Plaintiff’s underinsured motorist (“UIM”) claim. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the sole remaining claim in this case, for insurance bad faith.1 For the reasons that follow, NGM’s motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND2 A. The Initial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cherie Hugh v. Butler County Family YmcaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Dona W. Horowitz, Individually and as Co-Executrix of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased Alfred Camner, Co-Executor of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company, in No. 94-1900. Dona W. Horowitz, Individually and as Co-Executrix of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased Alfred Camner, Co-Executor of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased, in No. 94-1901 v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.