Legal Opinion
Hanson v. Denckla
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 13, 1958No. 107PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
357 U.S. 235 (1958)
HANSON, EXECUTRIX, ET AL.
v.
DENCKLA ET AL.
No. 107.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 10-11, 1958.
Decided June 23, 1958.[*]
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
William H. Foulk argued the cause for appellants in No. 107. With him on the brief were Manley P. Caldwell and Edward McCarthy.
Arthur G. Logan argued the cause for petitioners in No. 117. With him on the brief was Aubrey B. Lank.
Sol A. Rosenblatt argued the cause for appellees in No. 107. With him on the brief were D. H. Redfearn, C. Robert Burns, R. H. Ferrell and Charles Roden.
Edwin D. Steel, Jr. argued…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Warren; Dissent.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of San Francisco CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of San Francisco CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. Real Property located at 8911 Highway 49District Court, E.D. California · 2019