Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of San Francisco County

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2016No. S221038Published

1Dissent

WERDEGAR, J.,

Dissenting.—The court holds today that 592 plaintiffs residing in states other than California may sue Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) in a California superior court for injuries resulting from these plaintiffs’ *814use in their own states of BMS’s prescription drug, Plavix. Because BMS is not incorporated or based in California, its activities in the state are insufficient to establish general personal jurisdiction—jurisdiction for disputes unrelated to the company’s California activities—over it in California courts. (Maj. opn., ante, at pp. 788-789.) The majority, however,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API