In re K.F.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Father appeals from the family court’s order terminating his residual parental rights over K.F. He argues that the court erred by failing to recognize that the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services bore substantial responsibility for the circumstances alleged to support the termination order. We affirm.
¶ 2. Mother and father, who have never married, are the parents of K.F., born in October 2002. Shortly after K.F.’s birth, father was incarcerated on probation violations related to domestic violence toward mother. In December 2002, K.F. was adjudicated as a child in need of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re B.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- In re B.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- In re H.A.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In re S.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- In re G.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In re R.W. and N.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- In re D.S., In re M.H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re N.L., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In re J.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In re J.L.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.