Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 7, 1911No. A-417PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from McIntosh County Court; FranJc W. Rushing, Judge. Will Clark was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and brings error.

1Per curiam

Will Clark, plaintiff in error, was -tried and convicted upon an information charging a violation of the prohibition law, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days. The judgment and sentence was entered on August 11, 1909. An appeal was taken by filing in this court on November 8, 1909, a petition in error with case-made attached.

Numerous errors are assigned, but it is only necessary to notice one. The state introduced but two witnesses. One, W. A. Chelton, was called by the state as a witness in chief. The defendant interposed an objection…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. State ex rel. Little v. SpencerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. State v. SchnepelMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State v. CookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. State v. RenoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Harding v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Findley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Whitworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API