Legal Opinion

State v. Schnepel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1900No. 1,478PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. Henry Schnepel was convicted of grand larceny. From an order granting a new trial the state appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

On October 14, 1897, the defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and thereafter, on the 21st day of October, was sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for the term of one year. Thereupon he made a motion for a new trial, alleging as grounds therefor various prejudicial errors. On March 4, 1899, the motion was granted. From the order granting a new trial the state has appealed. The order does not indicate the ground upon which the action of the trial court was .based in granting the motion. It will therefore be necessary to notice all the assignments of error made by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. State v. GleimMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Scott v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State v. CalderMontana Supreme Court · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. CroweMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. PippiMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. PhillipsMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. ColoffMontana Supreme Court · 1951

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API