Legal Opinion

Weed v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1996No. C3-96-394PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

At issue in this appeal is whether a check received by a taxpayer in 1991 and thereafter retained but not cashed by the taxpayer is includable in the taxpayer’s 1991 Minnesota taxable income. The tax court concluded that the taxpayer constructively received the income in 1991 and it was therefore properly taxable in that year. We affirm.

I

In 1991, Relator, Michael A. Weed, left his employment at IBM in Rochester, Minnesota, where he had been employed as an engineer since 1979. Weed claims that he was unlawfully discharged from IBM, and subsequently filed suit in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roaderick v. Lull Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Cleo Beatrice Baxter and Albert N. Baxter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Hedrick v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Lundeen v. Cozy Cab Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Webb Business Promotions, Inc. v. American Electronics & Entertainment Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Busch v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API