Fanning v. Foley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco vacating a judgment, and from an order quashing summons and dismissing action. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This action was commenced November 1,1879, in the District court of the Twenty-Third Judicial District, to foreclose a street assessment, and the summons was issued on the same day. November 4th it was served upon certain named defendants, none of whom, as is now admitted, had or ever had any interest in the premises upon which it is sought to foreclose the lien.
*338It is admitted that Joseph D. Gaven was the sole owner of the premises, and continued to be so up to the time of his death, after which his executor sold the land to one Capurro. Gaven was made a defendant, but was not…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Riskin v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- San Francisco Protestant Orphan Asylum v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Kline v. BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Scott v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.