Bellamy v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
After a jury trial, appellant Bellamy was convicted of distributing cocaine in a drug-free zone and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it (“PWID”) in a drug-free zone. 1 On appeal he contends (1) that he was prejudiced by a prosecution letter that allegedly misrepresented the testimony of an expert narcotics witness, (2) that the trial judge erred by neglecting to instruct the jury on the drug-free zone element of the charges against him, and (3) that he was entitled to a full evidentiary hearing on his claim of juror misconduct. We find no reversible error…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lowery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Purcell v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Thomas R. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Commonwealth v. CostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.