Legal Opinion

Bellamy v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 2002No. 99-CF-1173PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant Bellamy was convicted of distributing cocaine in a drug-free zone and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it (“PWID”) in a drug-free zone. 1 On appeal he contends (1) that he was prejudiced by a prosecution letter that allegedly misrepresented the testimony of an expert narcotics witness, (2) that the trial judge erred by neglecting to instruct the jury on the drug-free zone element of the charges against him, and (3) that he was entitled to a full evidentiary hearing on his claim of juror misconduct. We find no reversible error…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lowery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Purcell v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Thomas R. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. CostSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API