Legal Opinion
Hickerson v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1998No. 96 Civ. 2203(MGC), 96 Civ. 2204(MGC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these two actions move for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction staying enforcement of Text Amendment N 950384 to the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York (the “Amended Zoning Resolution”), which regulates the zoning of “adult establishments.” 1 The motion is denied for the reasons that follow.
In a case in which the moving party seeks to stay governmental action taken in the public interest pursuant to a statutory or regulatory scheme, the issuance of a preliminary injunction requires the movant to demonstrate both…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hickerson v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Gasparo v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Vega v. State University of New York Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- City of New York v. Stringfellow's of New York, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.