Legal Opinion
Kehm v. Procter & Gamble Co.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided June 29, 1982No. C 80-119PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McMANUS, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s resisted motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, filed May 3, 1982, its unresisted motion to stay imposition of costs, and its resistance to plaintiffs’ bill of costs, both of which were filed May 14, 1982. Ruling in accordance with order.
This is a products liability action arising out of the death of Patricia Kehm. Plaintiffs, Mrs. Kehm’s surviving husband and children, alleged that Mrs. Kehm died of Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) proximately caused by her use of Rely tampons, a product…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Berry v. CSX Transp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- In Re Air Crash Disaster at Stapleton International AirportDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1989
- Will v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1986
- Meaders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Comerio v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.