Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1899No. 2,651PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Tipton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

This action was begun by appellee William R. Young against appellants Emanuel R. Coxen and Samuel J. Porter, as principals, and William B. Young, William J. Minor, Leonard Compton, Joseph A. Innis and Seneca G. Young, as sureties on a bond given to the trustees of the school city of Tip-ton, .to secure the faithful pei’formance of a contract entered into by the principals on said bond and such trustees, wherein said Coxen and Porter agreed to build a schoolhouse in the city of Tipton. The bond sued upon, and which is made a part of the complaint, is as follows: “Know all men by these…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Williams v. MarklandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Waterman v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Irwin v. KilburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Hart v. State ex rel. RockIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Town of Gastonia v. McEntee-Peterson Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Ochs v. M. J. Carnahan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Indianapolis Mortar & Fuel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API