Legal Opinion
Hart v. State ex rel. Rock
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1889No. 13,146PublishedCited by 25 opinions
From the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The complaint of the relator is based on a bond executed by Hays as principal, and the other appellees as sureties. The condition of the bond is thus expressed :
“The conditions of the above obligation are such that whereas, the above bound Orlando Hays has been awarded the contract for constructing sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, of the Pleasant Hill and Manilla Free Gravel Eoad, in Shelby county, Indiana, and has entered into a written contract with the engineer and superintendent of said free gravel road to construct and complete said sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, of said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Faurote v. State ex rel. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Scobey v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Coquillard's Adm'r v. BearssIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Greenman v. CoheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Smith v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Greenfield Lumber & Ice Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Potter v. Ajax Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
- Southern Surety Co. v. KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.