Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Palmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1961No. Civ. 13PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Respondents, attorneys at law, formerly represented appellant in the probate of his wife’s estate, and in asserting his individual claim to an interest in property transferred by the wife before death. The complaint in this action charges respondents with negligently and wrongfully advising appellant as to his community property rights, and with failing to protect his property interests.

Appellant and his wife were married in 1918. Prior to her death, she deposited funds, which appellant alleges were community property, in a joint tenancy account with her sister. The wife also made the sister…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Woley v. TurkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Raggio v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Ordway v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clinton v. Joshua Hendy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Fay v. MundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Atiya v. Di BartoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. McKenzie v. AlbaeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Nicoletti v. LizzoliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API