Legal Opinion
Chmill v. City of Pittsburgh
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 15, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1047 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
John S. Chmill, David Hirosky, John G-. Holtz, Thomas Pflum, David J. Puciata, Lawrence T. Yakich, and Paul R. Myers (appellants) are individuals who reside in the City of Pittsburgh. In August of 1975, appellants took a physical performance examination to become certified and hired as firefighters for the City of Pittsburgh. Out of approximately 1500 persons who took the test, appellants were ranked between slot No. 15 and slot No. 21 on the competitive list of applicants who have passed the examination for the position of firefighter.
The City of Pittsburgh requested…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Carter v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- 20 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1728, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,313 Detroit Police Officers' Association v. Coleman A. Young, Mayor of the City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Chmill v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Baker v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Sienkiewicz v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.