Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1983No. 651PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant challenges the lower court’s contempt order, arguing that he was justified in refusing to testify after being granted immunity because the Assistant District Attorney had threatened to prosecute him for perjury if his testimony failed to conform to his prior statement to the police. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the contempt order and judgment of sentence.

Appellant was called as a witness for the prosecution in the Commonwealth’s case against Ocíele Hawkins, who was charged with the December 18, 1978 murder of James Hughes. On January 8,1979, appellant gave a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. ApfelbaumSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. DiPasqualeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. United States v. Rocco Frumento in Re Subpoena to Vito N. PisciottaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. Piscanio AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. RedmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Grubb v. GrubbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. SwinehartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. RedmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API