Legal Opinion

United States v. Rocco Frumento in Re Subpoena to Vito N. Pisciotta

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 18, 1977No. 76-1251PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to determine whether a defendant who has been tried and convicted but not yet sentenced, and whose post-trial motions were still pending at the time the government sought his testimony at the trial of his codefendants, may be compelled to testify under a grant of immunity. Upon his refusal to testify, the district court entered an order of contempt and confinement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826. Although the government contends that the termination of the trial at which he was to testify renders this appeal moot, we disagree.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Diop v. Ice/Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. John Von BartaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Kenneth Lee v. William Stickman Stephen Zappala, Jr. Michael FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. United States v. Jack E. BronstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API