Legal Opinion

People v. Pruitt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 2, 1967No. Gen. 66-37, 66-38PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

This appeal involves two cases — consolidated for trial— in which each defendant was indicted for the offense of the possession of burglary tools. (Ill Rev Stats 1965, c 38, § 19-2.) The defendants moved to suppress the alleged burglary tools on the ground that they were discovered in an unlawful search of the personal effects of the defendant, Esther Pruitt, without her consent and without a search warrant, when neither defendant was under arrest; and that the arresting officers, at such time, had no reasonable grounds to believe that either defendant was committing or had committed an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HuttonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  2. People v. NunezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. People v. SymmondsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. People v. BeallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API