Legal Opinion

Orkstein v. 1440 Associates, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel H. Hoestadteb, J.

The plaintiff, a statutory tenant of office space, moves for an injunction pendente lite directing the defendants to list the name of a subtenant to whom he recently rented an office on the lobby and floor directories of the building in which the offices are situated. The expired lease prohibits subletting without the landlord’s written consent, but provides further that such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The plaintiff has occupied his space since 1929 and it is not denied that he has for many years leased a portion of his suite to various subtenants without objection of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yome v. GormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Bachman v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. 130 West 57 Corp. v. HymanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
  4. Bobrose Developments, Inc. v. JacobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Gross v. Libby Properties, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bisca v. BiscaNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  2. 41st Street Building Corp. v. RothenbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
  3. In re CohenNew York Surrogate's Court · 2004
  4. Happell v. GenoeseNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API