Legal Opinion
Chambers v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 7, 2022No. 5:22-cv-03137Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ROSCOE CHAMBERS, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 22-3137-JWL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner, a prisoner in federal custody at USP-Leavenworth (“USPL”), proceeds pro se. The Court grants Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court has screened the Petition (Doc. 1) under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases, foll. 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and dismisses this matter without prejudice.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Abernathy v. WandesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Brace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Sines v. WilnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.