Legal Opinion

Brace v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 15, 2011No. 10-3120PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

David George Brace, a federal prisoner incarcerated in Leavenworth, Kansas, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On appeal, Brace argues that he may pursue relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is an inadequate or ineffective remedy. Exercising jurisdiction' under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM the dismissal of his petition. 1

I

In 1995, following an undercover investigation, Brace was charged in a four-count indictment with conspiring to launder and laundering purported…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, KSCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Garza v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. WandesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Hale v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Wilson v. RoyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API