People v. Castro
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant argues on this appeal that the police acted unreasonably in conducting a pat-down search based on a tip supplied by an informant during a face-to-face encounter with police that defendant had a gun and said that he intended to "rip off a 'queen’ ”.
Resolution of this question turns primarily on an assessment of the credibility of the officer who testified before the suppression court. Thus, in view of the undisturbed finding that the police possessed reasonable suspicion to frisk defendant, his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. VincenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. Van LuvenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. CartagenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. SledgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. AgymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. VehapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.