Legal Opinion

People v. Castro

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1986PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant argues on this appeal that the police acted unreasonably in conducting a pat-down search based on a tip supplied by an informant during a face-to-face encounter with police that defendant had a gun and said that he intended to "rip off a 'queen’ ”.

Resolution of this question turns primarily on an assessment of the credibility of the officer who testified before the suppression court. Thus, in view of the undisturbed finding that the police possessed reasonable suspicion to frisk defendant, his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. VincenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. Van LuvenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. CartagenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. SledgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. DeJesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. AgymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. VehapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API