Dalesio v. Allen-Bradley Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SNYDER, District Judge.
There is before this Court for determination, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant Allen-Bradley Company (Allen-Bradley) pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.,1 which is based primarily on the contention that under the law and the record as it now stands, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and viewed in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
The Plaintiff’s cause of action arises out of the de-energizing of an electric magnet holding a three thousand pound coil…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Mary Elizabeth Foy Donnelly v. H. Gibson GuionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Vera Croley, Etc. v. Matson Navigation Company, David E. Bouler v. Matson Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barron v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Dawson v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Hardy v. Volkswagen of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975