Masterson v. Munro
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an action in ejectment, the land in controversy consisting of a strip ten feet by twenty-five feet. Both parties claim through deeds from Ottinger and Brooks. The deed to respondent and the deed to the predecessor of appellant Margaret were each dated and acknowledged September 30, 1862. Respondent and appellant bought their respective lots at an auction sale, and the particular tract in dispute is included in both deeds. Ottinger and Brooks were the owners of one hundred vara lot No.. 149, situated at the corner of Second and Townsend streets in San Francisco, and for the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Gudger v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Mylius v. Raine-Andrew Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Gardner v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Berton v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.