Simmons v. Kapture
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
J., BATCHELDER, GILMAN, GIBBONS, COOK, McKEAGUE, and GRIFFIN, JJ., joined. MARTIN, J. (pp. 451-58), delivered a separate dissenting opinion, in which DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, and CLAY, JJ., joined.
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case is whether the rule of criminal procedure recently articulated by the' Supreme Court in Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. 605, 125 S.Ct. 2582, 162 L.Ed.2d 552 (2005), applies retroactively to cases on collateral habeas corpus review. In Halbert, the Court held that the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses require the appointment of counsel for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Halbert v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Patrick Simmons v. Robert KaptureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. MaxsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Sanders v. LaflerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Huang v. Presbyterian Church (USA)District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- People v. MaxsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MaxsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.