Legal Opinion · Dissent

DiIaconi v. New Cal Corp.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1982No. 5319Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent.

The majority opinion states:

The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs-minority shareholders’ derivative action and request for liquidation, brought pursuant to § 53-16-16, N.M.S.A.1978.

They appeal; we affirm.

The trial court entered a “Decision” in which it made findings of fact and conclusions of law. The conclusions of law read:

1. The restraining order heretofore entered will be dissolved.

2. The complaint of plaintiffs shall be dismissed.

3. Each of the parties should bear his own costs.

Plaintiffs appealed from the Decision, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. No final judgment…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ex Parte TiffanySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API