Archibold v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vollack
John E. Arehibold, Harry A. Galligan, Jr., Edythe S. Miller, and John B. Stuelpnagel (the plaintiffs) appeal the district court’s order dismissing the plaintiffs’ cause of action after the district court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint. 1 We affirm the district court’s rulings.
I
On November 16,1994, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) issued an order to show cause to address possible violations of the PUC’s Rules Regarding Telecommunications Service Providers and Telephone Utilities (Telephone Rules) by U.S. West Communications (U.S. West). 2 In its order to show…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Silver Eagle Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Keystone, a Div. of Ralston Purina Co. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lake Durango Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Trans Shuttle, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Public Service Co. v. Trigen-Nations Energy Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999