Premco Drilling, Inc. v. Maillet Bros. Builders, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment on its complaint and also on the defendant’s counterclaim. This appeal by the defendant is from the judgment on the counterclaim. The defendant assigns error in the refusal of the court to correct its finding by striking certain paragraphs and adding others.
The following facts were found: The plaintiff was engaged in the business of drilling wells, and the defendant was in the business of building houses. On or about November 21, 1963, the parties entered into an oral contract wherein the plaintiff agreed to drill a well for the defendant. Although the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gager v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Bruce v. McElhannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Davis v. MerrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Wetherell v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Cameron v. SissonArizona Supreme Court · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vernali v. CentrellaConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
- Kocian v. DeVitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968