Legal Opinion

Danforth v. Ruotolo

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 8, 1994PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Gavin Ruotolo appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, (Cumberland County, Lipez, J.) entered on a $75,000 jury verdict in favor of Mauro Danforth. 1 Ruotolo argues that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for judgment as a matter of law on Danforth’s quantum meruit claim. 2 We affirm the judgment.

The jury was warranted in finding that in 1982 Mauro Danforth had an idea for developing a piece of property west of the Maine Turnpike in South Portland. He hired a production company to prepare a videotaped presentation of the property and asked an architect…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aladdin Electric Associates v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  3. Ames v. Dipietro-Kay Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Estate of WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. Bourisk v. AmalfitanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Paffhausen v. BalanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. In Re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  3. Withers v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  5. Rezac Livestock Commission Co. v. Pinnacle BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API