Marantz Co., Inc. v. Clarendon Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAFFREY, Senior District Judge.
These actions present various claims for damages arising from the performance of certain agency agreements between the plaintiffs and defendant, Clarendon Industries, Inc. (“Clarendon”). Jurisdiction is based on the diversity of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. These matters are now before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Marantz Company, Inc. (“Marantz”) and on defendant Clarendon’s cross-motions for partial summary judgment against both plaintiffs. In addition, Akai America, Ltd. (“Akai”) has requested the court to reconsider its…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Hannon v. Original Gunite Aquatech Pools, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Lee v. Allied Sports Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Clarke v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Omni-Wave Electronics Corp. v. Marshall IndustriesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- In Re Lone Star Industries Inc., Concrete RRDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Zircon Co. v. Graphik Dimensions, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1996