Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Propel Property Tax Funding, LLC

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 8, 2017No. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00731-JAGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

John A. Gibney, Jr., United States District Judge

Garry Curtis was behind on the taxes he owed to the City of Petersburg (“Peters-burg”), so he entered into an agreement with Propel Property Tax Funding, LLC (“Propel Tax”), and Propel Financial Services, LLC (“Propel Financial”) (collectively, “Propel”). Through this agreement, Propel paid taxes to Petersburg on behalf of Curtis, and then Curtis paid back Propel, with interest. Curtis, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated consumers, has now sued Propel based on the term of this and accompanying agreements, plus the related…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garry Curtis v. Propel Property Tax FundingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. Thrasher v. Rocky Mountain Auto Brokers, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API