Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. Glover
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from an interlocutory order denying the appellant’s, Central National Insurance Company of Omaha (CNIC), motion to compel arbitration in the suit brought against it by the appellees, Wayne and Dana Glover (the Glovers). We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The general rulé in Texas is that only final judgments are appealable and interlocutory matters are not. See, e.g., Schlipf v. Exxon Corp., 644 S.W.2d 453, 454 (Tex.1982). A judgment is final if it disposes of all parties and all issues pending before the court. Schlipf, 644 S.W.2d at 454. Jurisdiction of…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Cherokee Water Co. v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- L. H. Lacy Co. v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- USX Corp. v. West, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. MacK, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
- Lee v. El Paso County, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Hagood v. City of Houston Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Amoco Gas Co. v. MG Intrastate Gas Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995