Legal Opinion

Miles Savings Bank v. Liquin & Swandal

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1931No. 6,809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an action brought on a promissory note dated December 1, 1923, in the sum of $2,954.90, alleged to have been made by defendant corporation and payable to F. B. Hemingway, father-in-law of C. K. Liquin, and by Hemingway transferred to plaintiff after maturity.

The note was signed as follows: “Liquin & Swandal, Inc., by C. K. Liquin, President. Attest, Austin Swandal, Secretary.” The note contains the indorsement of C. K. Liquin and Austin Swandal, and, when the action was commenced, they were made parties defendant. When the trial began, the action was dismissed as to defendants C. K.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bates v. PrebleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  4. Mayger v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bouton-Perkins Lumber Co. v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HeastonMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API