Legal Opinion
Pope v. Huff
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 30, 1944No. 8626PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Associate Justice.
After the decision in the habeas corpus case of Pope v. Huff,1 appellant Pope filed a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The District Court held a full hearing, decided the issues against appellant, and discharged the writ. An appeal was filed, but it was not prosecuted and was dismissed. On September 7, 1943, appellant filed a third petition for habeas corpus. The District Court dismissed this third petition “for the reason that the issues raised in said petition have been adjudicated.” This appeal followed.
Appellant is in custody under two distinct…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Waley v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wong Doo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Funk v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Lee Vainderbilt PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Stewart v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Forrest Brooks, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.