Legal Opinion

Young v. Enfield

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 12985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Defendants Elmer Enfield and Southland Home Laundry Corporation appealed from the judgment entered in this action brought by plaintiff James A. Young to obtain an accounting of the business conducted by said corporation and a determination of his interest in the capital stock of said corporation and his right to participate in the management thereof. The terms and provisions of said judgment will be set forth in detail hereinafter.

The facts which gave rise to the action are as follows: Defendant Elmer Enfield desired to acquire an interest in a laundry business. Plaintiff wished to find a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kittle v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Johnson v. FarmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API