Legal Opinion
In Re Xerox Corp. Securities Litigation
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 30, 2010No. Civil Action 3:99CV02374 (AWT)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF PROFESSOR DAVID DENIS
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Exclude the Expert Report and Testimony of David Denis is being denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The court assumes familiarity with the factual background of the case. See In re Xerox Corp. Sec. Litig., 165 F.Supp.2d 208 (D.Conn.2001). In brief, as alleged in the Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (Doc. No. 42), Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) is purported to have misrepresented the impact of a reorganization of its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dalberth v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014