Legal Opinion
Luster v. Whitlock
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 27, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*406Opinion op the Court
Judge McCandless
Revering.
On the 15th. of June, 1914, Dicie Whitlock conveyed a small body of land in Pike comity to Matilda Duster, the recited consideration being “of the sum of the lifetime maintenance for Dicie C. Whitlock' and Matilda Bnmgardner, to see that they are cared for the period of their natural lifetime and Matilda Bumgardner decently buried. ’ ’
Dicie Whitlock and Matilda Bumgardner were sisters, aged about 80 and 78 respectively. . Matilda Luster was a niece and something over 50. Each'of the sisters had some small .means in addition to this tract of land…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Van Orman v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Gabbard v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Gabbard v. TruettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955