Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided May 14, 1999No. 06-98-00055-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice ROSS.

B.J. Franklin appeals from his conviction for the offense of aggravated assault by threat with a deadly weapon. He was found guilty by a jury, and his punishment, enhanced, was assessed at imprisonment for ninety-nine years.

Franklin contends that his conviction is void according to statute and contends that it violates the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He further contends that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay evidence, by allowing a witness to testify in such a manner as to violate his right to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Donoho v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Rogers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  3. Grant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Edward Cornell Knight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Carmon Kennedy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API