The Bencliff
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Admiralty. On exceptions to taxation of costs.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The question raised by the respondent’s exception has been already decided in his favor by The L. F. Munson (D. C.) 127 Fed. 767. In accordance with that case, the fee of $20 due in the present suit to the libelant’s proctor should have been included in the bill of costs before, and not after, the division. To add the fee after the division charges the respondent with the whole of this particular item, although the decree of the court requires him to pay one-half only. The Bencliff (C. C.) 155 Fed. 242.
The libelant’s exception to the disallowance of the charge…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Jacobsen v. Lewis Klondike Expedition Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Edison v. American Mutoscope Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Lee Injector Mfg. Co. v. Penberthy Injector Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- The South PortlandDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- The TexasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Crowe v. Peaslee-Gaulbert Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Jenkins Petroleum Process Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1939
- Jones v. Edward B. Smith Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.