State v. Reynolds

UDALL, Chief Justice:

Appellants were convicted of robbery and unlawful wearing of a mask. They bring this appeal from those convictions.

Appellants contend that the trial court erred in allowing certain admissions and statements of appellants into evidence; that the court unduly restricted appellants’ right to cross-examine a state’s witness; and that the court erred in not submitting a proper instruction on circumstantial evidence.

Appellant Zuck signed a statement admitting commission of the crimes charged in the information. The trial court conducted a hearing without the jury to determine…