Legal Opinion

(1997)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided January 10, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Mr. Barnes:

You have requested our opinion concerning your office's desire to develop and implement a "substance abuse fund." You pose the following questions:

1. In the absence of specific statutory authority, may a court require a defendant to make a "contribution" to such a fund as a condition of probation or probation before judgment?

2. Does a juvenile master have comparable authority in delinquency matters?

3. If such a plan is legally permissible, may collection and enforcement be administered under the auspices of the Division of Parole and Probation?

Our opinion is as follows:

1. A…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Arciniega v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Caldor, Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. United States v. William S. Lawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  5. Arthur J. Porth v. The Hon. George Templar and the United States of America, United States of America v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API