Legal Opinion
Jorge Yarur Bascuñán v. Daniel Yarur Elsaca
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 30, 2017No. 16-3626-cvPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:
The question presented in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs have plausibly alleged “a domestic injury” to their business or property within the meaning of Section 1964(c) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), the provision commonly referred to as civil RICO. 1 This question is one of first impression—in this (or any) Court of Appeals—arising from the Supreme Court’s decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community. 2
In RJR Nabisco, the Supreme Court held, among other things, that Section 1964(c) of the RICO statute, which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Eliahu v. Jewish Agency for Isr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Armada (Singapore) Pte Ltd. v. Amcol Int'l Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Dennis v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Horn v. Medical Marijuana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.