Omaha Street Railway Co. v. Cameron
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J. cited, as to the relative rights of traveler and company: O’Neill v. Drydoclc E. B. & B. B. Co., 29 N. E. Rep. [N. Y.], 85; Shea v. St. Paul City B. Co., 52 N. W. Rep. [Minn.], 902. In support of the instructions; Omaha Horse B. Co. v. Doolittle, 7 Neb., 485; Union P. P. Co. v. Pasmussen, 25 Neb., 813; Lynn & B. P. Co. v. Boston & L. P. Co., 114 Mass., 88.
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
James S. Cameron sued tbe Omaha Street Railway Company, hereinafter called the “ Railway Company,” for damages in the district court of Douglas county. Cameron pleaded that the Railway Company was a coi’poration operating a street railway in the city of Omaha, on Twenty-fourth street, among others, the motive power of which was electricity, and for cause of action against the Railway Company alleged in substance, that on Twenty-fourth street the Railway Company had two tracks and this street was intersected at right angles by Binney street running east and west; that about 10 o’clock…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BaierNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Omaha Street Railway Co. v. CraigNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- American Water-Works Co. v. DoughertyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Omaha Horse Railway Co. v. DoolittleNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lake Roland Elevated Railway Co. v. McKewenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Dahmer v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
- Spears v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Omaha Street Railway Co. v. MathiesenNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Omaha Street Railway Co. v. EmmingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.