Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Kromski

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1995No. C-940373PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Presiding Judge.

On February 17, 1994, defendant-appellee, Justin Kromski, was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol pursuant to R.C. 4511.19(A)(1). The trial court granted Kromski’s motion to suppress, finding that his warrantless arrest was not supported by probable cause. Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Cincinnati, filed a timely appeal pursuant to Crim.R. 12(J), asserting in its sole assignment of error that the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress. It argues that the arresting officer had sufficient information which allowed her to conclude, based…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. City of Fairfield v. RegnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. ConoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DetersOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. McKeehan v. American Family Life Assurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. CarmicalHamilton County Municipal Court · 2000
  4. State v. TrueOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API