Williamson v. Culpepper
Supreme Court of Alabama
Error to the County Court of Wilcox. Tried before the" lion. S. G. Cochran. Assumpsit by the plaintiff against the defendant in error.
Read the full summary
Error to the County Court of Wilcox. Tried before the" lion. S. G. Cochran. Assumpsit by the plaintiff against the defendant in error. By bill of exceptions it appears, that the plaintiff in support of his action, read in evidence an instrument of which the following is a copy: “ Received of R. H. Williamson a note on S. W. Portis, for five hundred dollars, due 17th day of April last, as collateral security for the sum of two hundred and ninety-five dollars and four cents, which amount is due on the first day of November next, and if the said R, H. Williamson shall cause the above stated sum…
1Opinion of the CourtChilton, J.
This agreement does not admit of the construction placed upon it by the County Court. Indeed it. is scarcely open for construction as to whether it was a conditional sale or security, since it expressly states that Culpepper holds the note “ as collateral security for the sum of two hundred and ninety-five dollars and four cents, due the 1st November 1846.” If, however, the subsequent provision in the contract, “ that on failure of the plaintiff in error to pay that sum on the day it falls due, the defendant was to hold the note on Portis’ as his own- property,” rendered it of doubtful import…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sewall v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Rankin v. MortimereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- Freeman v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Carey v. RawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mobile Building & Loan Ass'n v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Cousins v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. BancroftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Smith v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Barrow v. BrentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.