McDonald v. Alamo Motor Lines

NORVELL, Justice.

The jury in this case found that the sole proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries was the act of a third party. Judgment for the defendant was rendered upon the verdict.

McDonald, the plaintiff below, has appealed and presents fifteen points of error, all of which are argued together and in substance present one contention, namely, that the judgment must be reversed because the jury was informed of the fact ■that plaintiff carried health and accident insurance.

McDonald relies upon three formal bills of exception as supporting- his contention. The pleadings and the matters set…