Cleveland Shopping News Co. v. Lorain
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFunk, J.
The questions involved under all four defenses are only two:
First, Can equity intervene, or has plaintiff an adequate remedy at law?
Second, Is the ordinance discriminating as against plaintiff and thus unconstitutional?
First. Does the petition and the evidence show such a property right in plaintiff that equitable jurisdiction will be invoked to protect it and that the legal remedy is wholly inadequate to protect it?
The petition shows that plaintiff is a corporation duly organized and engaged in printing, publishing and circulating what is known as an advertising newspaper; that it makes a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Robison v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Local No. 782Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chrestensen v. ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- In Re Writ of Habeas Corpus for ThornburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Chrestensen v. ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Lewis v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1938