Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith, Jr
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided July 5, 2000No. 99-0932/APublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge CRAWFORD
delivered the opinion of the Court.2
At trial by general court-martial, appellant was found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of larceny and conspiracy to commit larceny, in violation of Articles 121 and 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 881, respectively. His case was tried by a military judge sitting alone. Appellant entered into a Stipulation of Fact and a Pretrial Agreement. The Pretrial Agreement provided that if the sentence included confinement or a fine, the approved sentence would not include a period of confinement in excess of 24 months nor a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. CruzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. HuffmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. BayhandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. HeardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. GilchristArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. IveyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.