Legal Opinion

Dye v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 2010No. 09CA48PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

{¶ 1} Brion and Misty Dye filed suit against Celesta Smith, Bradley Smith, Steve Carson, Kyle Carson, and Michael Ash (collectively, “appellants”). The Dyes alleged that the appellants removed a garage from property the Smiths were renting from the Dyes and that during the removal, Mr. Smith, the Carsons, and Ash attacked Mr. Dye. The trial court entered a default judgment against the appellants and found that they were jointly and severally liable for $14,000 in damages for removing the garage.

{¶ 2} The appellants contend that the trial court erred in finding the Carsons and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In re Jane Doe 1Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. PHH Mtge. Corp. v. NorthrupOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Henry v. RichardsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Saqr v. NajiOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Queen v. HannaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Berube v. Richardson, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API