The People v. Thomas Jackson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 22 The People &c., Respondent, v. Thomas Jackson, Appellant. Mitch Kessler, for appellant. Peter H. Willis, for respondent. RIVERA, J.: Defendant Thomas Jackson alleges that his conviction should be reversed because the trial court issued an erroneous Sandoval ruling and denied his right to be present at a sidebar conference during jury selection. Defendant's first challenge is unpreserved and his second ground for reversal is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. FeingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.