Legal Opinion

The People v. Thomas Jackson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2017No. 22Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 22 The People &c., Respondent, v. Thomas Jackson, Appellant. Mitch Kessler, for appellant. Peter H. Willis, for respondent. RIVERA, J.: Defendant Thomas Jackson alleges that his conviction should be reversed because the trial court issued an erroneous Sandoval ruling and denied his right to be present at a sidebar conference during jury selection. Defendant's first challenge is unpreserved and his second ground for reversal is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. FeingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API